Skip to main content

Palestinian Authority to discuss its political future this week

The West Bank Palestinian leadership will meet this week to discuss political and economic matters in light of the Israeli tax revenue freeze
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas (C) sits next to Palestinian prime minister Rami Hamdallah (L) in Ramallah on 11 November 2014 (AFP)

The Palestinian leadership meets this week for crucial talks on the future of the Palestinian Authority, whose existence is under threat after Israel cut off a key source of funds.

The Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), recognised as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people and their ultimate decision-making body, will mull an array of urgent economic and political issues.

Of most immediate concern at the two-day meeting in Ramallah starting on Wednesday will be the financial crisis facing the Palestinian Authority (PA).

For the past two months, Israel has withheld hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue owed to the PA, the interim governing body which rules the West Bank, after the Palestinians moved to join the International Criminal Court to sue Israeli for alleged war crimes.

The cash crunch has left the PA unable to pay 180,000 employees.

In another blow, a New York court last week found both the PLO and the PA liable for a series of attacks in Jerusalem, ordering them to pay damages of more than $650 million.

The mandate of the PA, which was set up through the Oslo Accords in 1994 as an interim self-governing authority, has long expired. The government, which was established in 1994 under the Oslo Accords, was intended to last for five years during which the West Bank and Gaza Strip would have been allowed a limited self-authority before being ready to form a self-determined state.

The presidential mandate of Mahmoud Abbas, who also serves as head of the PLO and the ruling Fateh movement, expired in 2009.

The Palestinian Legislative Council, or parliament, in which Hamas won a majority during the last elections in 2006, has not held a full session since 2007 when the movement forced its Fateh rivals out of Gaza.

Like in previous crises, the PA has threatened to halt security coordination with Israel in the West Bank, and even to dissolve itself, in a move which has sparked concern in both Washington and Europe.

Such a decision can only be taken by the 130 members of the PLO’s central council who meet this week in Ramallah.

Dismantling the PA?

“The PA cannot last in its current form- that is, without any real sovereignty- because on the ground, Israel keeps dividing up the land and (building) settlements,” warned Mohammed Shtayyeh, a former peace negotiator and senior member of Fateh, the dominant movement within the PLO.

Dismantling the PA would force Israel to send its forces back into all Palestinian towns and cities and take full responsibility for running civilian affairs and public services in the West Bank, which is home to 2.8 million people.

It would also have a major impact on Gaza despite Israel’s withdrawal in 2005.

Although the territory of 1.8 million people is technically managed by the Ramallah-based unity government, in practice most of the administration is still run by Hamas, which would not accept any Israeli involvement.

Before reaching a decision over its relations with Israel, the matter must be examined in depth by the PLO, said Ahmed Majdalani, one of the 18 members of the PLO’s executive committee, its most senior decision-making body.

Cooperation between both sides’ security forces in the West Bank and economic agreements may be reconsidered “despite strong pressure, especially from the Americans,” Majdalani warned.

The PA is estimated to be $2.43 billion in debt, with more than half of it public debt.

Empty threat?

In threatening to cut security cooperation, what the PLO wants is to “send a message to the international community to put pressure on Israel,” said Xavier Guignard, a political analyst based in Ramallah.

“It is saying: Israel is denying us 100 million euros of revenue each month, but it will cost the world much more dearly if we dissolve,” he said, referring to the inevitable security nightmare for Israel.

Ending security cooperation is “a threat that has often been brandished, but never carried through,” he said, adding: “We could still be surprised.”

Since the Palestinians won the rank of UN observer state in November 2012, Abbas has on occasion managed wrong-foot observers, most recently with his move to formally join the International Criminal Court.

The Palestinians will file their first complaint against Israel on 1 April, the date they formally become members.

Last year’s war in Gaza and the vast task of reconstruction, which has hardly begun, will also be on the agenda, alongside the Israeli blockade in place since 2006.

Last year’s floundering intra-Palestinian reconciliation agreement, which was supposed to end years of enmity between Hamas and Fateh, will also be discussed.

Formed in 1964, the PLO included Fateh and other Palestinian factions but not Hamas or Islamic Jihad.

A decade later, it was recognised by the UN as “sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people”- who number nearly 9 million people across the West Bank, Gaza, and the diaspora.

Stay informed with MEE's newsletters

Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked

 
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.