Skip to main content

The banality and boredom of anti-Muslim witchhunts. Or beware John Ware

The ideas of Muslim entryism and conspiracy have reached new and alarming proportions

So it is now the turn of Muslim NGOs in Britain - MEND and CAGE - for the John Ware treatment in this week's Dispatches (Channel 4). John who? I hear you cry. Well, in short he is someone who has made a career out of exceptionalising Muslims, their political activities, calls for equality and actually just general day-to-day doings, as things utterly alien, extraordinary and sinister.

This would be fine if these things were indeed any or all of the above, but as anyone who watched his latest salvo against Muslim political organisations in the UK can attest, quite probably a supermarket shopping list could be given the "evidence of extremism" treatment. 

For one glorious moment, while watching on catch-up the next day, I thought Chris Morris, the English comedian, had donned prosthetics and was attempting to spoof Ware's career as witchfinder general. Alas, mockumentary it was not, and once I realised this, then I was just bored. Stupefyingly bored.

Anti-Muslim mantra

So I could unpack the content, and the "argument" that MEND and CAGE are extremists. But why? We have been down this road so many times before, many of them "led" by John Ware himself.

There were his concerns over Muslim politics in Tower Hamlets, his take on and Islamic scholar Haitham Haddad versus Sara Khan and crew, or his many ravings on the same and more: the Muslim Brotherhood, Trojan Horse schools, extremism and so on for StandPoint magazine, or his diatribes about Al-Quds Day in The Jewish Chronicle of which he was an unlikely attendee last year.

Indeed he has in recent years become some sort of fixture at Muslim events, either in person (I remember he showed up at the launch of Environment of Hate: The New Normal for Muslims in the UK in 2015) or through undercover representatives as in this week's Dispatches. Yet what Ware "uncovers" is really just his ongoing mantra against Muslims and in particular the idea of Muslims having any sort of political agency.

What Ware 'uncovers' is really just his ongoing mantra against Muslims and in particular the idea of Muslims having any sort of political agency

Variously describing us as extremists and occasionally racists, his arguments seek to alienate us in whatever form from the political establishment (this week he targeted Jeremy Corbyn, a favourite, Baroness Warsi and Vince Cable) and to denounce any foreign policy concern any of us may hold, the chief of which – Palestine – gains most of his ire.

In terms of actual substance – well there just isn't any. Back in the mid-2000s when he turned his attention to the Muslim Council of Britain, the Muslim Association of Britain and then the Palestinian charity Interpal, Faisal Bodi wrote about the Ware hatchet jobs.

Hysterical journalism

As Bodi documented, Ware's 2005 programme "A Question of Leadership" (sounds familiar?) attracted over 600 complaints in just its first week after broadcast, most though not all of them, from Muslims protesting about its unusually hostile and one-sided nature.

One senior ex-Panorama journalist, who spoke on condition of anonymity, described the programme as "the most disgusting Panorama that I have ever seen. The presenter was acting like a prosecuting attorney, not a journalist." The Guardian's Madeleine Bunting called the documentary "McCarthyite".

Pupils from Eden Girls' School in Walthamstow holds flowers at Potters Fields Park in London on 5 June, 2017 (AFP)
So one of the things that really needs to be said is why are we still here? Why does Ware have (albeit increasingly niche) platforms to make spurious claims? How is it that his - at best ludicrous and sometimes outright hysterical (of varying kinds) journalism - still get heard?

Back in 2005 and 2006, we at the Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) issued campaign advice to those concerned about the programme on how to complain.

Ware, though happy to dish out all sorts of accusations, becomes rather unhappy when anyone, let alone ordinary Muslims in a position of extreme powerlessness in relation to him, turn critical. 

Why are we still here? Why does Ware have (albeit increasingly niche) platforms to make spurious claims? 

At the Dimbleby Lecture in 2005 given by the then commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Ian Blair, Ware, introduced by one of his more unbiased colleagues to Massoud Shadjareh of IHRC, reportedly confronted him in front of some of the Panorama team.

Launching into a characteristic rant on how unacceptable it was for Muslims to complain about the programme, Ware was confronted by Shadjareh's homage to the ever brilliant Catherine Tate. "Look at my face," Shadjareh is reported to have said. "Do I look bothered?"

Puritanical unanimity

And as far as the personal slights go, any number of those Ware has targeted could and indeed do laugh it off, but the continued existence of the Ware-like voice in British politics and media is what we need to focus on. While Ware himself may be reaching his sell-by-date, the idea of Muslim entryism and conspiracy have reached new and alarming proportions.

This month, as Peter Oborne reports on these pages, Ipsos Mori research has revealed that most general beliefs about Muslims are simply untrue, while the very real grievances of Muslims themselves are unheeded or dismissed.

This, however, is nothing more than a repeat of the findings of the British Muslims Expectations of the Government project funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust between 2004 and 2007. 

Most beliefs about Muslims in Britain are simply false. This poll proves it
Peter Oborne
Read More »

Six volumes of painstaking, academically rigorous research later, it showed that we were at least at an impasse. Instead, many of the things spoken about then can literally no longer be expressed. An example is the need for dual space for religious minority children in education, which has now been demonised first in the Trojan Horse affair and more generally across Jewish, Muslim and Christian faith schools.

No longer allowed to have expectations, Muslims (first, and then people of colour and minority faiths subsequently) must capitulate to the demands of a society hell bent - it seems - on a new form of puritanical unanimity.

For the problem with witchfinders, whether of the McCarthy or Salem type, is that while comic in their delusions, they will and must find witches. Once the climate changes to support their cries, then someone has to pay. Yesteryear and today John Ware saw Muslims as such. Tomorrow?

- Arzu Merali is a writer and researcher based in London. She is one of the co-founders of the Islamic Human Rights Commission ( and co-authored its recent study Environment of Hate: The New Normal for Muslims in the UK with Saied Reza Ameli. She is currently working on the multi-partner project ‘Counter Islamophobia Toolkit’ with the University of Leeds.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye. 

Photo: A man gestures at a woman wearing a headscarf at a demonstration organised by the far-right group the English Defence League (EDL) in central London on 24 June 2017 (AFP)

Stay informed with MEE's newsletters

Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked

Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.