'Brinkmanship and escalation': Iran set to breach cap on uranium stockpile
Iran appears on the brink of breaking through the limits imposed on its nuclear enrichment programme by the 2015 nuclear deal, following its warning that it would stop complying with the accord unless world powers acted to protect it against the Trump administration's devastating economic sanctions.
The Reuters news agency reported on Thursday that diplomats said new data from UN nuclear inspectors showed that Iran was still slightly short of the maximum amount of enriched uranium it is allowed to have under the nuclear deal, but it was on course to reach that limit at the weekend.
Stay informed with MEE's newsletters
Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked
Tehran had warned on 17 June that it would exceed the 300kg cap stipulated by the nuclear deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), on its stockpile of low-enriched uranium in ten days, which falls on Thursday.
Two of the diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity to Reuters, said Iran was producing at a rate of around 1 kg a day, meaning it could go over the line soon after a meeting of senior officials from Iran, France, Germany, Britain, Russia and China to discuss the nuclear deal in Vienna on Friday.
Tehran had originally announced in May its intention to stop complying with parts of the nuclear accord, unless world powers moved within 60 days to protect its interests against the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign. The 60-day deadline expires on 8 July.
It had issued the warning on the first anniversary of the US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal.
The announcement was met with US sanctions against Iran’s metals industry - including iron, steel, copper and aluminium - which accounts for “10 percent of its export economy,” according to US President Donald Trump.
"There is still time for the Europeans,” Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesperson for the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI), told a televised news conference on 17 June when Iran announced the ten-day countdown.
“But the Europeans have expressed indirectly their inability to act. They should not think that after 60 days, they will have another 60-day opportunity."
Britain, France and Germany have sent Iran an official warning that non-compliance with the nuclear agreement, not least the enrichment of uranium to higher levels than the JCPOA limit of 3.67 percent, will have serious consequences.
Carrots and sticks
While the snapback of European sanctions against Iran might be on the cards as an option of last resort, the EU will likely try to persuade Tehran back into compliance with a combination of carrots and sticks.
A recent decision by the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to extend Iran’s deadline for implementing international regulations against terrorism financing and money laundering signifies such a cautious approach.
A timeline of US-Iran tensions+ Show - Hide
Tensions have skyrocketed between the Washington and Tehran since US President Donald Trump announced last May that he was pulling out of the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal.
Here's a timeline of key events that have led to, and marked, the recent escalation:
8 May 2018: US President Donald Trump announces plans to pull out of a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. Under that agreement, the Iranian government agreed to curb its nuclear programme in exchange for a lifting of international sanctions.
Trump also says Washington will reimpose "the highest levels of economic sanctions" on Tehran.
Stay informed with MEE's newsletters
Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked
5 November 2018: The US reimposes sanctions on Iran's oil, banking and transport sectors. At the same time, Trump says he wants to gradually impose sanctions on the Iranian oil industry, citing concerns about upsetting energy markets and causing global price spikes.
8 April: The Trump administration blacklists Iran's elite military force, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The move marks the first time Washington has formally labelled another country's military a terrorist group.
30 April: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani signs a bill into law that declares all US troops in the Middle East as terrorists, and defines the US as a state-sponsor of terrorism.
2 May: The US stops issuing waivers to countries that import oil from Iran. Those waivers had allowed certain states, including Turkey, China, Japan, India and South Korea, to keep buying Iranian oil, despite American sanctions - and provided a lifeline for Tehran.
6 May: US National Security Adviser John Bolton announces that the Trump administration is deploying an aircraft carrier, as well as ships and bombers, to the Gulf. The move was meant to send a "clear and unmistakable message" to the Iranian government, Bolton said, amid intelligence reports that Tehran was planning attacks against American troops in the region.
7 May: Iran says it plans to withdraw from parts of the 2015 nuclear agreement with major world powers. The move comes one year after US President Donald Trump withdrew from the deal.
8 May: The Trump administration announces a new round of economic sanctions that will target Iran's metals trade - iron, steel, aluminium and copper, specifically.
9 May: As the drums of war began to beat louder in certain circles in Washington, Trump tells reporters that he "would like to see them [Iran] call me" - a sign the US president is perhaps seeking to de-escalate the situation.
12 May: The United Arab Emirates says four oil tankers were damaged in "acts of sabotage" off the coast of Fujairah, just outside the Strait of Hormuz. The UAE did not assign blame for the incident, but said it would launch an investigation into what happened.
13 May: Mike Pompeo makes a surprise visit to Brussels, where he seeks to get European leaders on board with Washington's "maximum pressure" strategy against Tehran. The US secretary of state gets a lukewarm reception, however, with the European Union's foreign policy chief instead urging the US to show "maximum restraint".
14 May: Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei says the country will not go to war with the US. "Neither we nor they - who know war will not be in their interest - are after war," Khamenei says.
15 May: Anwar Gargash, the UAE's minister of state for foreign affairs, says the country is committed to "de-escalation" with Iran, while refusing to assign blame for the 12 May "sabotage" of the oil tankers.
That same day, the US orders non-emergency government employees to leave Iraq, citing fears of an imminent attack by Iranian-backed proxies in that country.
19 May: A Katyusha rocket is fired into Baghdad's Green Zone, an area that houses government offices and foreign diplomatic missions, including the US embassy in Iraq.
21 May: A previously unknown Iraqi group claims responsibility for the rocket fired into the Green Zone. The Operations of Martyr Ali Mansour says the attack is retaliation for Trump's decision to pardon a soldier who killed an Iraqi detainee in 2009.
24 May: Washington announces plans to deploy 1,500 additional troops to the Middle East to counter Iranian threats, a decision Iran blasted as "extremely dangerous".
28 May: US National Security Adviser John Bolton says the attack on four vessels off the Emirati coast was caused by "naval mines almost certainly from Iran".
30 May-1 June: Saudi Arabia hosts a summit in Mecca to discuss recent tensions with Iran. On the eve of the talks, Riyadh blasts what it called Iranian "interference" in the region and demanded "firmness" over attacks in the Gulf.
7 June: The US imposes sanctions on Iran's largest petrochemicals holding group, accusing Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industries Company of providing financial support to an engineering firm with ties to the IRGC.
13 June: Two oil tankers suffer damage after an unspecified attack in the Gulf of Oman. Hours after the incident, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo points the finger at Iran, without providing evidence to back up his claim.
Iran immediately denies it was involved in the attacks.
14 June: The head of the United Nations calls for an independent investigation into the incidents in the Gulf of Oman.
Earlier in the day, US Central Command releases a video that it says shows Iranian IRGC members removing an unexploded mine from one of the damaged ships. That comes after Trump himself says the incident has Iran "written all over it".
Meanwhile, the owner of the Japanese vessel says crew members reported seeing objects flying towards them - which would appear to refute the US's version of events.
17 June: The US will send roughly 1,000 additional troops to the Middle East, Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan announces.
20 June: Iran says it shot down a US military drone entering Iranian airspace near the Straits of Hormuz. A US official confirms that a drone was shot down but says it was in international airspace.
21 June: US President Donald Trump says he ordered and then aborted a military strike on Iran roughly 10 minutes before the operation took place.
Trump says he called off the strike after US generals reportedly told him the attack would kill 150 Iranians. The US operation was "not proportionate", the US president says.
24 June: The US imposes a new round of sanctions on Iran, this time targeting the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
25 June: Trump threatens Iran with "obliteration" if the country were to strike American targets. His comments come after Iranian President Hassan Rouhani called the White House "mentally retarded" and vowed that Tehran would not back down from US sanctions.
28 June: The US Senate votes down an amendment that sought to bar Trump from being able to declare war on Iran without authorisation from Congress.
4 July: A supertanker suspected of carrying Iranian crude oil to Syria in violation of EU sanctions is detained in Gibraltar. Senior Iranian officials deny claims the tanker was headed to Syria.
5 July: A senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander suggests that Iran should seize a British oil tanker if the Iranian vessel detained off Gibraltar is not released immediately.
9 July: General Joseph Dunford, a top US general, announces plans to set up a coalition of allied countries willing to patrol key waterways in the Gulf region.
Dunford says the US military would provide command ships and surveillance technology, while its allies would escort ships and patrol the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb.
11 July: British officials say three Iranian boats attempted to "impede the passage" of a British oil tanker in Gulf waters, forcing a UK warship to intervene. Iran denies the accusation.
Meanwhile, Gibraltar police announce the arrest of the captain and chief officer of the Iranian supertanker on suspicion that the ship had breached EU sanctions on Syria on 4 July.
12 July: US lawmakers approve a measure that would force President Donald Trump to seek congressional approval before ordering military strikes against Iran.
16 July: Iran says it has ruled out entering into negotiations over its ballistic missile programme, directly contradicting statements made by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo earlier that same day.
18 July: Trump says American warship USS Boxer downed an Iranian drone in the Strait of Hormuz. But top Iranian officials deny the report.
31 July: Washington imposes sanctions on Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif. Zarif tells Saudi Arabia that Iran is "ready for dialogue".
5 August: The UK becomes the first country to join Washington's maritime security mission in the Gulf.
8 August: Iran's defence minister warns of "disastrous repercussions" if Israel were to join the US maritime security coalition in the Gulf.
15 August: The US Justice Department issues a warrant for Iran's Grace 1 after Gibraltar says it is ready to release the tanker.
18 August: The Grace 1, renamed the Adrian Darya-1, is released from Gibraltar after a five-week standoff.
19 August: Bahrain joins the US-led mission in Gulf waters.
21 August: Australia becomes the third country to join Washington's maritime security mission in the Gulf.
27 August: US President Donald Trump and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif both attended the G7 conference but do not meet.
28 August: The US Treasury Department issues sanctions against two networks it says are tied to Iran's missile proliferation programme. Meanwhile, the US's joint maritime security initiative in the Gulf officially launches.
3 September: France says it is prepared to offer Iran $15bn in credit lines to help ease Washington's economic pressure against the country - but the proposal hinders on US approval.
4 September: Iran's President Hassan Rouhani gives European powers another two months to save the 2015 nuclear deal, but warns that Iran is still preparing to breach the pact in ways that would have "extraordinary effects".
6 September: Two sources tell MEE that the Iranian oil tanker that was held by British authorities in Gibraltar for five weeks has delivered its cargo to Syria.
10 September: US President Donald Trump sacks national security adviser John Bolton, seen as the architect of recent US-Iran tensions. Meanwhile, the UK says Iran broke its promise by transferring oil to Syria aboard the Adrian Darya I several weeks after Gibraltar released the supertanker.
14 September: A coordinated drone attack strikes the heart of the Saudi oil industry, forcing the kingdom to shut down about half of its crude production.
The Houthi rebels claim responsibility, but US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accuses Iran of leading the attack. Iran denies this.
15 September: The commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps Aerospace Force, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, says that all US bases and aircraft carriers in the Middle East are within range of Iranian missiles
A senior Iraqi intelligence official tells Middle East Eye that the Saudi strikes were carried out by Iranian drones launched from Hashd al-Shaabi militia bases in southern Iraq.
16 September: President Donald Trump says the US was "locked and loaded" against Iran and he was "waiting to hear from the kingdom as to who they believe was the cause of this attack, and under what terms we would proceed!"
17 September: US Vice President Mike Pence warns Tehran that Washington is ready for military confrontation and will not ease its pressure campaign against the Islamic Republic.
18 September: Saudi Arabia says there was "unquestionable evidence" that the attack on its oil facilities was sponsored by Iran and was launched from the north of the kingdom.
19 September: Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif says Iran does not want war, but warns the US that any attack on Iran would lead to "all-out war".
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo responds to Zarif's comments, saying that Washington was searching for a peaceful solution to the conflict.
“They will rely on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to assess whether Iran has de facto violated the nuclear deal or not,” Aniseh Bassiri, an expert on Iranian-European relations at the London-based Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) told Middle East Eye.
“This could mean that they might wait until the next report is due in August, while in the meantime continue the shuttle diplomacy with Tehran in an attempt to convince them to reverse their decision.”
Growing differences between Europe and Iran will, however, make it easier for the United States and its regional allies to advance the “maximum pressure” agenda and inch closer towards mobilising a global coalition of the willing to make Tehran change course, even though Russia and China have expressed opposition to US sanctions against Iran.
“I think that the European states will have to react,” Patricia Lewis, Research Director for International Security at Chatham House, told MEE.
“They have held to the JCPOA, but if Iran moves away from it and starts to increase its enriched stocks, it will be hard within the European parliaments to resist calls for joining US sanctions.”
In an unprecedented move that carried more political than economic significance, on Monday the Trump administration sanctioned the Iranian head of state, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the financial network under his control, following the Revolutionary Guards’ high-stakes downing of US reconnaissance drone near the Strait of Hormuz.
“The likely response from the Trump administration is additional sanctions as well as a threat of military force,” Nicholas L Miller, professor of government at Dartmouth College and the author of Stopping the Bomb: The Sources and Effectiveness of US Nonproliferation Policy, told MEE.
“The stated goal of the administration is to ramp up pressure until Iran agrees to a new nuclear deal that includes greater, more long-lasting restrictions, as well as changes to Iran's behaviour in many other areas.
"But given Tehran’s resistance to these demands, it is likely that hardliners in the administration, such as [National Security Advisor John] Bolton and [Secretary of State Mike] Pompeo, are thinking of other ways to address the problem: namely through regime collapse brought on by sanctions, or through the use of military force if Iran breaks out of JCPOA restrictions,” explained Miller.
An equally alarming scenario for Iran is the reopening of its nuclear dossier at the UN Security Council (UNSC), where permanent members might reach a consensus, absent a veto by Russia or China, to categorise Iran’s nuclear non-compliance as a “threat to” or “breach of” peace, and thus punish it under Chapter VII of the UN charter.
The unique risk of treating the case under Chapter VII, which lays out conditions on the use of force, lies in its potential to be used by hawks in the Trump administration and US Congress as a legal cover to legitimise military action against Iran.
“First of all, what Tehran intends to do is not ‘violation’ of the nuclear deal, but in fact invocation of JCPOA articles 26 and 36, which allow it to take appropriate measures in response to other signatories’ failure to honour their end of the bargain,” Diako Hosseini, Director of the World Studies Programme at Iran’s presidential Center for Strategic Studies, told MEE.
“Anyway, if the case is referred to the UN Security Council, Tehran will immediately exit the nuclear accord. This is the state’s decision at the highest political levels,” he added.
In its 8 May statement on the retaliatory reduction of nuclear commitments, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) stressed that reopening the dossier at the UNSC will be met with a “firm and rapid reaction”.
A few days later, AEOI spokesman Kamalvandi warned that in the event of a UNSC referral, Tehran will not only scrap the nuclear deal altogether, but might also take “other measures” - which have been widely interpreted as possible withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
US 'surgical' or 'tactical' strikes
Given the sharply escalated tensions between the Iran and the US, Washington’s response at this stage, if it comes to pass, will likely be “surgical” or “tactical” strikes against critical nuclear facilities in Iran.
“Tehran will not initiate war against any nation, but it will not recognise limited attacks by the US or any other aggressor either," said Hosseini.
Rather, Iran’s retaliation against any military offensive will be unlimited in terms of lethal intensity and geographical scope.
“In other words, the United States should brace for war from the Mediterranean to the Persian Gulf, and from North Africa to South Asia before attacking Iran”.
This relentless spiral of escalation has arguably put Tehran and Washington on a collision course, as consistently intensifying US pressure on Iran is making an “off-ramp” option to avert a major confrontation in the future increasingly difficult, unless diplomacy is given a meaningful chance.
“In an ideal world, the United States would stop imposing additional sanctions and consider lifting or suspending others in order to convince Iran to stay within JCPOA limits and cease military provocations,” Miller said.
“It could then serve as a stepping stone to a broader dialogue. However, this seems quite unlikely, as it would require the Trump administration to abandon its maximalist demands of Iran, which have been a core element of its foreign policy.
"Unfortunately, the path we are on now appears to be towards more brinkmanship and escalation”.
This article is available in French on Middle East Eye French edition.
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.